← Fish wiki · Bloom map

Spotted wobbegong

Orectolobus maculatus

Spotted wobbegong (Orectolobus maculatus) — illustration

Illustration: Bloom by Day

PROTECTED — look, don't shoot

A flattened carpet shark patterned in dark saddles and pale rings, with a fringe of fleshy lobes along the edge of its head and a brown triangle between the eyes. It lies still under ledges and on open sand all day, and should be left exactly where it is — it bites and does not let go.

how to recognise it

don’t confuse with

Field marks read from Fishes of Australia, 2026-10-15. Our wording, their facts. Max size 170 cm TL.

facts

habitat
reef
size
~120 cm, to 170 cm
Max size from Fishes of Australia (170 cm TL); the typical size is Bluebird’s, not from a cited source
records near here
54 at 1 of 6 spots
A count of occurrence records near these spots, not abundance. Records are where someone looked.

when it has been recorded

JFMAMJJASOND
A gap means no record in the sample, not absence.

the rule

NSW — No take
source · verified 2026-10-01
no QLD rule listed — check before you dive
no closed season recorded for this species — that is not the same as open; check the official page
Rules checked 2026-10-13 against qld.gov.au

Rules change. Check before you dive.

See where it lives → bloombyday.com, the live map Diving today? → bluebirdday.app, the swell, wind and viz forecast
Occurrence data: Atlas of Living Australia (ala.org.au), CC-BY 4.0.
Diver transect counts: Reef Life Survey (reeflifesurvey.com), CC-BY 4.0, supplied via ALA.
Target and protected species: Queensland tidal-water size and possession limits (qld.gov.au) and NSW saltwater bag and size limits plus threatened species lists (dpird.nsw.gov.au).
Habitat and size: Bluebird, approximate, from general knowledge. Not cited. FishBase is CC BY-NC and this app is commercial, so it is not used.
Description written for Bloom. RECORDS ARE WHERE SOMEONE LOOKED, NOT WHERE THE FISH ARE. A record count is a count of records near here and nothing else -- it is not abundance, and a species with few records is not rare. Absence of records is not absence of fish.